Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas

As some of you may know, I was the strongest Clinton supporter. I wore myself out fighting for her at the orange Big Brother. I think anyone who follows names around here knows that I was almost violently anti-Obama.

So here's what I want to say to you, Hillary-loving brothers and sisters. GET A GRIP.

This is not about the strong fabulous white woman or the cool smart black guy. This is about one thing only. THE PLATFORM. Health care. Iraq. Iran, Taxes, etc.

No one's perfect. Maybe Barack is 60% perfect. But wouldn't you like 60% of health care rather than McCain's 0, 60% of out of Iraq and not-in-Iran, rather than McCain's?

I love you all for the cause, but please remember that this is about the quality of life. Not personalities. Hillary will have her day. She's made a strong impression. Trust that, and root for America, please.



Display:


I'm still betting that (2.00 / 3)

Obama flops and adopts the Clinton healthcare plan in the upcoming weeks; he's just waiting for McCain to make his next flop so that he'll have some cover from the flip-flopping charge.  Now that would be a change I think nearly everyone in this community could believe in.


by Blazers Edge on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:43:34 PM EST

My evidence (2.00 / 2)

is that he recently hired Hillary's former healthcare policy expert.  I would think she's reshaping his plan right now.


by Blazers Edge on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:44:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm still betting that (2.00 / 16)

He's tacking to the center.

Gotta give the guy credit. With all that new politics talk, he old politic'd our girl fair and square.

He kept the progressives online with yes we can and now he's all faith-based, Fisa, etc. But you know what? Good. He needs to win first, and I'm tired of Dems who don't know how to win. My biggest worry about Obama was he was too soft. Now I'm not scared of that anymore.


by NY Writer on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:50:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm still betting that (2.00 / 5)

I don't agree with you 100%...but, I agree with you at least 60%.
Plenty enough to tip and rec!
;)
by Kysen on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:14:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

To some that may sound cynical. (2.00 / 4)

Gotta give the guy credit. With all that new politics talk, he old politic'd our girl fair and square.

But it's the truth, and I'm quite satisfied to have a candidate who can out old-politic the Clintons. There are too many Obama supporters on here with stars in their eyes.


by Dumbo on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 03:31:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm still betting that (2.00 / 3)

I don't think he will... I think he'll let himself be negotiated in that direction when he's getting the bill through Congress.  If I were his people, I'd give Sen. Clinton the lead position on the issue next year and let her push him left, to counteract the pull right from the MegaCorpCo's and their lobbying cash.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:52:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm still betting that (2.00 / 1)

Why would Obama embrace mandates now? That makes zero sense.


by IsaccBurn on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:42:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama flops and adopts the Clinton healthcare plan (2.00 / 2)

This is ridiculous. In the first place, if Obama is moving to the center as the conventional tongue wagging is attacking him for, why would he move to her position which Hillary's own supporters claimed was to the left of his?

In second place, it seems like any REAL Clinton supporter would be tickled pink at the idea of Obama adopting her position rather than call it a flop.

I smell the unmistakable stench of McTroll.


by Beren on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 04:03:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 8)

Hillary asked her supporters to suck it up and support Obama, and that not doing so would ruin all chances of her goals to become law.  Obama's and Hillary's goals are now the same.  At this late stage in the game, anyone still anti-Obama is also anti-Hillary, and most likely never a Hillary supporter to begin with.

PUMA's are a myth.  The PUMA leader has been giving campaign contributions to McCain as early as 2000.


Ornithological Vaccinations and Aviary Heuristics
by OVAH on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:51:18 PM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 6)

Please.  That is just so ridiculous and make believe.  You can't make things happen by demanding it, or wishing it along.


by Scotch on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:53:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 6)

That is just so ridiculous and make believe.  You can't make things happen by demanding it, or wishing it along.

PUMA in nutshell.
To bad they are too far gone to realize it.


by Kysen on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:17:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

I thought that was just Democracy.


by Scotch on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:21:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 3)

Democracy establishes their right to vote and support whoever they wish.

It also establishes our right to call them short-sighted and unwise for not supporting the Democratic nominee.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:23:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

You think that Democracy is ridiculous and make believe?

You think that Democracy is built on hoping to make things happen by demanding it, or wishing it along?

Odd take on Democracy you have.

Again, describes the PUMAz to a T.


by Kysen on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:27:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

Whatever way you wish to interpret my post, concerns me not.


by Scotch on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:48:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

What is this "PUMA" you speak of?


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:07:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

A new organization of Clinton people who won't vote for Obama. PUMA = Party Unity My Ass


by NY Writer on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:14:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

snark-sorry

I thought it was

Pummeling Uncle McCain's Ass


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:17:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

More like:
Puckered
Up to
McCain's
Ass
by Kysen on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:23:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (1.75 / 4)

Proboscis
Up
McCain's
Ass
by spunkmeyer on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 01:41:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

I guess I could google this, but from what I have heard about PUMA holds no interest, but please be serious, what soes it really stand for? bored curiosity i suppose on my part.


The Moose is on the loose. "And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 01:36:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

It really does stand for Party Unity My Ass. That's the name they chose for themselves. A fairly immature name for a fairly immature group of people.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 11:24:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

Heh. No kidding. Talk about needing to come out from the cave on that Pacific island, WWII is over...


The Moose is on the loose. "And I scream at the top of my lungs, what's going on?"
by Hollede on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:15:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

HA! Wait until you see this myth (1.00 / 3)

roar in November.  You will become a believer!

PUMA POWER!!!!!


by CoyoteCreek on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 08:52:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: HA! Wait until you see this myth (2.00 / 1)

I pray that we all don't get stuck with the government you deserve.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:33:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: HA! Wait until you see this myth (2.00 / 1)

Ha!  You're right, they're about as non-mythical as Batman and Super Girl.

PUMA POWERS, ACTIVATE!!!  ALL 5 SUPER PUMA'S TO MCCAIN'S RESCUE!!!


Ornithological Vaccinations and Aviary Heuristics
by OVAH on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 08:24:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (1.75 / 8)

Are we supposed to ignore the kind of things he has been pulling lately, for example what he did to Clark?  Again, Obama has to earn my respect to earn my vote.  He took a couple of steps backwards in the last couple of day in that process.  I do not blindly support candidates when they are flip flopping all over the place and dumping the people who are trying to support them all over the place. Not anymore.  We still have some time, let's see what he will do.


by Scotch on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:51:42 PM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 6)

You are SO behind the times. Obama defended Clark today.http://thepage.time.com/2008/07/01/mccai n-camp-keeps-pressure-on-obama-over-clar k-statement/


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:57:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (1.80 / 5)

He is always having to backtrack.  It would be nice if he would think these things out ahead of time, ao he wouldn't have to.


by Scotch on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 10:59:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 8)

No one's perfect. But Obama is far superior to McCain.

If you want a perfect person to vote for, you are going to wait your whole life for that person to come along.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:01:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

So, now we are down to voting for the lesser of two evils.  Damn,I didn't want to do that AGAIN. I'm looking for someone to offer more than just being better than his opponent.  Yeah.  He might be better than McCain.  That isn't saying much to me.  


by Scotch on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:18:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 4)

So it makes more sense to vote for the GREATER of two evils?
(not that I see it as being 'two evils' in the first place....just going along with the analogy)

Truly demented.

Seriously, I can almost understand not voting.
I can almost understand writing in Hillary.
Voting for McCain, if one ever truly supported Hillary, is so completely batshit loony and utterly devoid of logic that I cannot understand it.
Again, truly demented.

(I don't remember if you are one of the ones voting for McCain or not....so, if not, this comment is not directed at you but at those who fit the profile)


by Kysen on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:24:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 2)

If you try really hard, you can almost tell from my comment that I am not voting for mccain.


by Scotch on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:55:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

So it makes more sense to vote for the GREATER of two evils?

YES! CTHULHU IN '08!  http://bumperstickers.cafepress.com/item /vote-cthulhu-2008-sticker-bumper/363692 05


by synchronicity on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:21:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 4)

You accuse him of flip-flopping after the mental gymnastics you just pulled about this issue? First you claim he did something that he didn't do and then when shown the error of your ways you try to twist it 180 degrees and accuse him of something else. You sure are funny. :)


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:05:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 8)

There are some people that, even if told that Barack Obama rescued 30 children from a burning schoolhouse, would criticize the fact that he was unable to rescue the class hamster.

The converse of that is that there are also people that think Obama can do no wrong.  Most rational Democrats fall somewhere in the middle.

I guess my point is that it's pointless to engage certain people.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:15:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 4)

I've never replied to one of scotch's comments before because s/he is usually so obviously wrong that it doesn't need to be pointed out. This time was just too good to pass up.

I guess my point is that it's pointless to engage certain people.
You've got that right.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:19:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

I would rather have a thoughtful response, but there are slim pickings these days among supporters such as yourself.  Your type of response is so dime a dozen as compared to one that really contributes to the discussion.


by Scotch on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 01:01:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (1.75 / 4)

I actually LOL at your reply. Thank you for the laugh.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 01:21:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

^^^^^^^ Example of what I am talking about.^^^^

Much obliged.


by Scotch on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:09:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

No need. (none / 0)

You are a constant reminder that some people aren't worth engaging.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:42:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 2)

Well don't expect 'Hamsters against Obama' to be happy.


by Politicalslave on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:34:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 5)

Fine but what I'm saying is this is about the platform. First and last.


by NY Writer on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:37:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 3)

Ohhh My...That f'ing moron Obama...How dare he try to get more votes by shifting to the middle!!  What is he thinking?  I mean really he should just go crazy liberal now and let the chips fall where they may.  I mean we know he won't win the POTUS, but atleast he will appease about 15% of the electorate.  Shit he will carry California, New York and DC, better than McGovern!  He will have still have his job as Senator and can try real hard to get the Liberal agenda through with a McCain presidency...He will be in a better position to improve healthcare, get us out of Iraq, fix a failing economy in the Senate anyways...I don't know wtf he is thinking trying to syphon some votes out of the Republican base, he should use the same strategy as Kerry and Gore..they were so close.


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:26:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 2)

Candidates who have their finger to the wind to get votes are useless.  Obama should strive to be more, pick a value, and stick with it.  


by Scotch on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:58:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

What I prefer about Obama over McCain is that at least Obama has only one finger in the wind at a time.

Any politician is going to flip or flop sometime. McCain has ten fingers extended and is no more reliable than a Hasbro compass.


by RickWn on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:01:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

I guess it's better being in the wind, than some place else...


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 03:56:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

Hootie always good to hear your comments.


by Politicalslave on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:41:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

Rush doesn't like McCain, but he's supporting him.

On McCain: "If your team isn't in it, you root for the team you hate less. That's McCain."

On Obama: "He's a liberal. I oppose liberals. That's all that's involved here."
http://thepage.time.com/2008/07/01/mccai n-the-team-you-hate-less/

Aren't we as smart as Rush?


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:00:13 PM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 2)

PUMA's apparently aren't.


by Kysen on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:18:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

? Who gives a flippin' crap about the PUMAs? There are, what, 20 of them total?

Dunno why folks on this site are obsessed with those people. You're not actually worried about them or something dumb like that, are you?


by SuGeAtARC on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 01:32:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (1.75 / 4)

I've said all along, I'd vote for him IF Hillary is the VP....that would prove to me that he really is for unity....

otherwise....

my vote will be a protest.


by nikkid on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:01:30 PM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 3)

There are major differences between McCain and Obama involving life and death and this is what will determine your choice? With all due respect, I think that what happens to people in the US and around the world is more important than whether Obama has demonstrated unity to your satisfaction.

4113 American soldiers have died in Iraq so far. Many more have been maimed or have suffered traumatic brain injuries. One wants troops there into the foreseeable future and the other does not.

And I could name many more issues. IMHO, This is what the election is about, not who is vp.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:05:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (1.00 / 3)

yup  that is what i'm basing my ENTIRE vote on this time....

the democratic party cannot USE me again this time after they threw away the best and most qualified candidate for what I consider the least qualified candidate they have ever nominated.....

for me - this time - I won't be voting on issues.


by nikkid on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:12:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 6)

So that's the 'American Idol' school of civics, is it?  My God we have devalued the coin of the realm through popular culture and pointless individuation.  Feel your power...is it growing?


by Shaun Appleby on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:23:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

Yeah, as a former Dodd supporter, I'm mad that they threw away the most qualified candidate too, but Chris wouldn't want us to vote for McCain.


by IsaccBurn on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:43:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 4)

But I' was a Hillary guy. You'll only be protesting everything Hillary lives for.


by NY Writer on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:37:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Did PUMAs make the news today? (2.00 / 5)

Who are you responding to - I thought the PUMAs had already faded into obscurity. Apparently not.

As to platform - Obama's is still in the malleable Jello stage, let it set before we decide we agree with it.


by catfish2 on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:02:28 PM EST

Re: Did PUMAs make the news today? (2.00 / 4)

Kool-aid, Jello...  Make up your mind.


by Shaun Appleby on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:24:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did PUMAs make the news today? (2.00 / 5)

Whiskey?


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:36:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did PUMAs make the news today? (none / 0)

Um, Obama's proposing new policies, not altering old ones. Other than agreeing to the FISA compromise, he hasn't changed anything.


by IsaccBurn on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:45:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Campaign finance (1.00 / 1)

guns death penalty


by catfish2 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:15:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Campaign finance (2.00 / 1)

To my understanding he always supported death penalty for child murderers and rapists. And AFAIK he always argued that the 2nd amendment referred to a personal right to gun-ownership.

I've not yet seen evidence that he switched his position on this issues -- can you link me evidence to that supposed fact?


by Aris Katsaris2 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 11:25:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 2)

I'm more of a iced tea guy.
Unsweet. (sacrilege!)
No lemon.
;)

by Kysen on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:29:31 PM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

Oh, bugger all....was meant as a reply to Shaun.


by Kysen on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 11:30:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 5)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_ap pointment_history_for_United_States_fede ral_courts

Go to the middle section entitled Partisan mix of the circuit courts.

This is the real legacy of the think tanks, the Heritage society and the Federalist society.

Life time appointments.  

The 4rthm 3rd, and the 9th are the next targets.

It has been the MOST successful and lasting effect of the Reagan revolution.

So, Scotch and Nekkid may be voting for a different set of reasons, but here's your choice.

John Edwards, or someone like him cleaning up the trashing of the Justice department.

Barrack Obama and a strong majority on congress appt USSC judges and EVERY FEDERAL DISTRICT Court judge for the next 8 years.

Or, this trend, >60, 70% dominance of the courts by idealogue conservatives.


On Nov 4th, Barack Obama officially ends the Southern Strategy....
by WashStateBlue on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:14:20 AM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

This picture might give some of you a better idea of the red vs. blue state of our federal circuit and district courts right now (it's a little big and I apologize for that):


"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 07:13:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Deja Vu (none / 0)

 Didn't we have this meeting already?


by xdem on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:52:08 AM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

I wish diarists would stop making the assumption that having supported Hillary in the primary means you have somehow promised to blindly follow her in whatever she does.

I know lots of Hillary primary voters who just don't like or trust Obama. Period. The only thing Hillary has to do with it is that they thought she was the better candidate (and still do, really.)

It's a serious mistake to assume that these voters are "doing it for Hillary" when they stay home or vote McCain. That's really not it.  They just don't like Obama. You're not going to reach them by telling them they're betraying Hillary or Hillary's ideals because that's never what it was about.

If you want to bring them over, my suggestions would be:

1) Don't assume they're Hlllary's mindslaves. Accept that they have doubts about Obama that they think are reasonable and troublesome.

2) Attempt to address their doubts about Obama the person. Don't wave the liberal platform at them; if that was what they were voting on, they'd already be voting Obama, reluctantly or not. Assume that they hold some liberal views and some conservative views and that they aren't in love with anyone's platform right now.

3) Attack McCain's policies, not the man himself. There are a lot of people who just like and respect the guy, regardless of his party affiliation. Attacking him personally is going to make Obama look cheap and slimy, even if it's only his surrogates doing it (Looking at you, Clark!)

The Hillary supporters who are currently not going to vote for Obama are, mostly, not adherents of some kind of Hillary cult of personality. (Of course some are -- or more likely are hiding behind her due to their own personal grievances -- but really, not that many. Mostly just the loud ones.) They don't object to Obama because he defeated Hillary; they object to Obama because they object to Obama. After all, if they really liked him, they'd have voted for him in the primary, right?

Like most elections it's going to come down to issues of personality, character, and trust. Obama's recent behavior isn't weighing well on these issues, and if he doesn't shape up he's going to go down in flames in November.

And no one wants that.  


by SuGeAtARC on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 01:45:32 AM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 1)

I agree with some of what you said, but I think this post was more dedicated to the PUMA types, in which case it very much is all about Hillary.  It's an extreme hatred for Obama over perceived slights that they feel Hillary received.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 01:53:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 3)

Sure, but they're a tiny (if loud) part of the "I voted for Hillary in the primary and I'm not sure I'm voting Obama in the GE" group.

And they're just using HIllary as political cover for their own gripes. (I think some of their gripes are legit, but I don't think they should be claiming they're doing it "for Hillary" because they clearly aren't.)


by SuGeAtARC on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:01:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 3)

Excellent points.  With all of the "PUMA" talk, it's easy to forget that the majority of Democrats that still aren't behind Obama are rational people and probably willing to come to the table at some point.  When they do, we need to address these people and their concerns respectfully and see if some common ground can be found.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:08:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (2.00 / 2)

I'm a former Hillary supporter and as much as I wanted her to be the nominee, that didn't happen.

Such is the process of American politics.

Once the numbers were posted and after Hillary gave her concession speech, like the Dodd, Biden, Kucinech and Edwards supporters before me, my chosen candidate (not my preferred candidate) became clearly visible and now has my unquestioned vote.

These so-called PUMA democrats can, as far as I'm concerned, go vote for any one or any platform they so desire.

What's going to happen over the next four months is that far more new voters will sign on for Barack than the self-absorbed, disgruntled minority of former Democrats who intend to outright defect or wastefully write-in Hillary.

The stakes are extremely high this election. We all know that. I'm not for coddling the PUMA's. It's kind of like a Special Ops mission: Yeah, our good buddy got shot down, but we've got a mission to go do... so let's get on with it.


by RickWn on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:49:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

"These so-called PUMA democrats can, as far as I'm concerned, go vote for any one or any platform they so desire."

Er. Well. Yeah, of course they can. It's the way things are done in the U.S., last I checked (despite what the Supreme Court thinks.)

I'm not sure what you mean by "coddling" the PUMAs. If you mean yelling at them on MyDD -- well, any of them that are actually here I suspect are completely immune to any of your opinions or rhetoric.

The point I was hoping to make is that paying attention to them is coddling them. Attention is what they want. If you want them to go away, pretend they don't exist, and pretty soon they won't.  Or at least, they'll be seen as powerless as they really are, and they won't get any news coverage.

If you really want to piss off an attention hog, ignore him or her completely.


by SuGeAtARC on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:54:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

"They object to Obama?

Not much to object to.

Point is: He's a Democrat
So when we assume Hil supporters will be Obama supporters we assume they're for the Dem platform


by NY Writer on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:00:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

I think that only goes for the most orthodox of Democrats. A lot of Dems and Republickers I know cross the party line when they feel like it. Here in Massachusetts we've had a lot of Republicker governors despite being among the bluest of blue states, and that wouldn't have happened without a lot of crossover voters. (Now of course we have Deval Patrick.)

Anyway, people of "moderate" party affiliation react to "orthodoxy" the same way that mainstream religious people react to James Dobson. So I don't think the Orthodoxy Argument is going to gain you much. I mean, registering as a Democrat or Republicker isn't like taking a sacred oath written in blood.


by SuGeAtARC on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:10:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

NYWriter - what inspired this diary? (none / 0)

All I've noticed is the Wes Clark-McCain back-and-forth.

I feel for you, striving for party unity in this environment. That deserves a rec. Peace ;)


by catfish2 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:40:56 AM EST

Re: NYWriter - what inspired this diary? (2.00 / 1)

This is what is wrong with the no25cents crowd. You have stated that you are part of their group.

You see things that aren't real, like a flip on the Clark / McCain flap. You also buy into other urban myths, like the birth cert controversy, the 'whitey' tape, etc... Come back to reality, catfish. It's not all that bad.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 11:35:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: NYWriter - what inspired this diary? (none / 0)

I'm a Democrat. You know?


by NY Writer on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:01:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

But why now? Questioning the timeliness (none / 0)

I thought everybody was talking about Wes Clark this week.


by catfish2 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 12:20:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But why now? Questioning the timeliness (none / 0)

Only McCain backers, including your beloved PUMA, were trying to make it something it wasn't. Even the media managed to get it right within 24 hours.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 02:23:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Keep it up, you're winning me over! (2.00 / 1)


by suzieg on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 03:25:37 AM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

It's a shame that diaries like this one are still necessary. We need to unite all our forces. It should have happened already. I realize this isn't a process that happens overnight, but we are getting near the convention now, and this election fight is on.

Hillary said: "We are one party, we are one America...we will not rest until we are on a path to peace, prosperity and progress in the 21st century." Let's make this happen.


The direct use of force is such a poor solution to any problem, it is generally employed only by small children and large nations. -- David Friedman
by pollbuster on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 07:29:35 AM EST

why is Obama playing with the constitution? (2.00 / 1)

There are some really sinister moves that I'm seeing from Obama and the constitution.

Freedom of speech :  
Obama's people worked to shut down sites that were pro-Clinton, anti-Obama.  Shut them down.

Freedom of the press :  Obama's people put pressure on CNN to not have any Hillary people representing her side after North Carolina

separation of church and state :  Obama has said he wants to expand Bush's 'faith-based initiative' but his version would allow for hiring based on discrimination of the person's religion

Fourth ammendment : FISA

Right to bear arms :  Obama said the DC ban was constitutional in the Chicago Tribune

When do people say enough is enough and no deal?  As democrats, when is enough enough?  


by searchforsolidarity on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 08:13:22 AM EST

Re: why is Obama playing with the constitution? (2.00 / 1)

Freedom of speech :  
Obama's people worked to shut down sites that were pro-Clinton, anti-Obama.  Shut them down.

Support - with links to clear, undisputed sources tying it to the Obama campaign - or retract.

Freedom of the press :  Obama's people put pressure on CNN to not have any Hillary people representing her side after North Carolina

That's called playing the press... every campaign does it.  I also would like to see a link for this claim, though, in the spirit of your supporting your assertions.

separation of church and state :  Obama has said he wants to expand Bush's 'faith-based initiative' but his version would allow for hiring based on discrimination of the person's religion

Provide a link for the italicized portion, retract the claim and apologize, or be known as intellectually dishonest.  Your choice.

Right to bear arms :  Obama said the DC ban was constitutional in the Chicago Tribune

He also issued multiple statements opposing the DC ban... statements for which he was lambasted on this site.

When do people say enough is enough and no deal?  As democrats, when is enough enough?  

I agree.  When do we say "enough is enough" and just accept that the so-called Democrats who join groups like PUMA are short-sighted fools who clearly have no idea what their former candidate, Hillary Clinton, actually stood for?  

When do we say "enough is enough" and simply quit trying to reach people who obviously are willing to hurt workers in this country, put soldiers overseas at continued risk, and deny their daughters their rights in order to prove some point?  

When do we say "enough is enough" and call PUMAs for what they are - workers for the Republicans, whether wittingly or not - and accept that they are on the same moral plane as one of Bush's 28-percenters?


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:42:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: why is Obama playing with the constitution? (2.00 / 2)

Obama has said he wants to expand Bush's 'faith-based initiative' but his version would allow for hiring based on discrimination of the person's religion (emphasis added)

No, it doesn't.  Quite the opposite, in fact.


by synchronicity on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:52:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: why is Obama playing with the constitution? (2.00 / 1)

Again with the urban myths and misunderstanding of Obama's stances. It's no wonder you don't like him, if you hold mistaken beliefs like these.

Obama's people worked to shut down sites that were pro-Clinton, anti-Obama.  Shut them down.
Pure nonsense. I challenge you to post a single proof of this. This is like Lieberman's complaints that someone shut his site down and then we discover his campaign forgot to pay their hosting bill. Laughable.

Freedom of the press :  Obama's people put pressure on CNN to not have any Hillary people representing her side after North Carolina
You mean the network that people call the Clinton News Network? Again, laughable.

separation of church and state :  Obama has said he wants to expand Bush's 'faith-based initiative' but his version would allow for hiring based on discrimination of the person's religion
A complete falsehood. Obama specifically stated that discrimination would NOT be allowed. There is no ambiguity in his speech on this issue.

Fourth ammendment : FISA
Obama stated he was opposed to telco immunity. No one has said there is no need for a FISA bill. In fact, the current bill is so flawed that it must be replaced. Only people with no understanding of the issue think the bill is completely unnecessary.

Right to bear arms :  Obama said the DC ban was constitutional in the Chicago Tribune
Obama says he supports the right to keep and bear arms. He also believes local communities have the right to pass laws restricting that right based on their local needs. Sorry this is too nuanced for you.

When do people say enough is enough when it comes to these same complaints based on twisting his positions on the issues? When is enough enough?


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 11:48:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (1.00 / 4)

So what you are extending is an invitation to
be a sock puppet for Obama...

Because you were a sock puppet for Clinton.

I don't wanna be a sock puppet for anyone.

Obama wants my vote...he earns it by talking about what I care about...instead of advising his troops to avoid issues and talk about conversion.

In other words tell the voters how they came to worship the Hawaiin Messiah...kinda like how they found Jesus.  That's part of the training to work on the Obama team.  Conversion politics.

I'm not buyin this crap.  Obama's team has decided that they don't need "the base."

So the base has to ask the question...do we need him?

I'm sick of voting for the worst of several alternatives.  If I'm gonna be a whore I want to get something back...like a pay raise, medical insurance, a house I can afford, and transportation that doesn't cost me more than food and I don't want to send my kids to Iraq.

What's the Hawaiin Messiah gonna do about that?
So far he's saying nothing.  


by jd2 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:07:47 AM EST

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

That is it.  Fight the power!!  I am holding out for a pony and a light saber.  If the Hawaiian Messiah doesn't deliver he is going to lose my vote.  


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:17:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Invitation to Anti-Obama Clintonistas (none / 0)

I want my pineapple!!! The Hawaiin Messiah promised pineapples for all. Gimme mine!!!!!!


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 11:50:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I had to unrecommend your diary. (none / 0)

It's become infested with vermin and must be quarantined.  Sorry :(


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 09:45:47 AM EST

Wrong (1.50 / 2)

Many people are mad at Obama and the DNC for issues beyond candidate loyalty.  There were a lot of unsavory deals that went down with the whole DNC Florida/Michigan debacle.  The RBC meeting on May 31st was outrageous- and backdoor deals were cut that gave Obama delegates from a state in which he had REMOVED HIS NAME FROM THE BALLOT.  Pelosi, Dean, Brazile all firmly in the tank for Obama from day one - and constantly undercut Hillary.  This is about a candidate who won the nomination based on the disenfranchisement of two states.  It's about serious issues- not just "get a grip" resentment.  If you thing that this PUMA movement is all based on "sour grapes"- you need to check yourself.  There are over 150 websites devoted to it!  It's an insurgency.  Maybe they will not matter- if Obama is strong enough without them, but that is not the point (at least in my opinion).  Criticizing their actions might be valid- but you cannot discount the valid arguments for their anger.
I am NOT a PUMA member- but I defend their anger and fully understand it.
by easyE on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 10:06:32 AM EST

Obama for faith-based pr., for telocom immunity (1.50 / 2)

Just to show his huge mistakes in last 2 days:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/02/us/politics/02fisa.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/02/us/politics/02obama.html?_r=1&oref=login
and you want us to embrace it?
Obama is a weak candidate, and we disagree with him strongly. We cannot support him and you know that.

Welcome to a Landslide without white Working class, Latinos, Women, Seniors and holding-on sweeties
by engels on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 10:27:20 AM EST

Re: Obama for faith-based pr., for telocom immunit (none / 0)

Oh, engels is here! Our favorite troll. Gimme a hug, engles.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 11:52:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

A list ing of at LEAST 52 mcsame flip flops (none / 0)

The Official JMcCain Flip Flop and Master Gaffe List

http://www.bi30.org/wordpress/flipfloppe r.htm

It's a delicate dance, and John McCain is `liable to break a hip'June 19th, 2008

42 more flips here
http://tinyurl.com/5hlrt9


by Mae Scott on Wed Jul 02, 2008 at 01:10:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.